Wave disturbance study of port facilities at Kardamena, Kos Island


The wave disturbance study is a supportive to the main study entitled "Improvement – Expansion of Port Facilities at Kardamena Port – Island of Kos" commissioned to CNWAY in October 2017.

Read more about the port expansion study


Wave disturbance analysis serves as a decision making tool which enables port layout optimization through the assessment of berthing conditions. The scope of the study is to investigate wave disturbance in the proposed port layout (as set out in the outline design), assess how this compares with the existing wave disturbance and provide evidence that the proposed berthing facilities are acceptable from a wave-disturbance standpoint.

Numerical Modeling

Wave climate

Wave and wind data are derived from the WAMC4 and Skiron/Eta forecast model from node 945_217 with latitude and longitude 36.80o, 27.20o respectively. The node is located 5,3 kilometers away from the project site. The duration of the data covers the period between 2001 and 2010.

Model characteristics

The simulation is usually performed by employing two separate models, the offshore and the wave disturbance model. The former extends from the position of offshore wave conditions (a node of the regional WAM wave model) up to the shore, and its role is to define the boundary conditions for the wave disturbance model.


  • Offshore model: It extends 4,5 km along the NΕ-axis and 2,5 km laterally. It covers an area of ​​approximately 11,8 km2 and consists of 153.000 elements and 77.500 nodes
  • Wave disturbance model: It extends 1,2 km along the NE-axis and 400 meters laterally. It covers an area of ​​about 300 acres. and consists of about 644.000 elements and 344.000 nodes

A total of 16 wave cases corresponding to 48 simulations were executed, which consist of:

  • 16 TOMAWAC simulations to propagate wave conditions from the WAMC4 regional model node to the project location,
  • 32 ARTEMIS simulations, for the calculation of wave disturbance, 16 for every wave case, 2 layouts (existing and proposed layouts).


For further analysis and objective comparison of the results, areas of interest have been defined for every layout. For each area, the following parameters have been calculated:

  • Active (Ηm0(rms)) and maximum wave height (Hm0(max)) for absolute disturbance and
  • Active (Ηm0(rms),), maximum (Hm0(max)) and minimum wave height (Hm0(min)) for differential disturbance
Absolute disturbance plots

Absolute wave disturbance plots show the results of each layout for each wave case, as derived from the simulation.

Differential disturbance plots

Differential wave disturbance plots result from the algebraic subtraction of the wave disturbance between the compared layouts. The "Reference Layout" disturbance is subtracted from the disturbance of the solution under consideration. Positive differential disturbance (red gradient), means the layout under consideration causes more disturbance than the reference layout whereas negative differential disturbance (blue gradient), means the layout under consideration causes less disturbance than the reference layout.

This easily identifies the positions as well as the extent to which each layout has an advantage / disadvantage over the "Reference layout". Below is an example of differential wave disturbance of the proposed works (Layout 1) with respect to the Existing layout.

Quantitative evaluation

The score is calculated using an evaluation model that takes into account the following wave disturbance parameters for each zone:

  1. Active wave height (Hm0(rms)),
  2. Maximum wave height (Hm0(max)),
  3. Wave height exceeding predefined limits of allowable disturbance (Hm0(exc)),
  4. Zonal percentage area exceeding predefined limits of allowable disturbance (PAexc).

The following table summarizes the parameters calculated for each boundary indicated in the wave disturbance plots, as well as the individual score obtained.

Score and characteristics of wave disturbance by season and use


Based on the results of the wave disturbance analysis it can be concluded that wave disturbance in the existing port layout is overall acceptable.

The approach channel orientation, as set out in the proposed works, does not prevent wave penetration in the port basin, especially during winter, which results in increased wave disturbance. However, during winter port utilization remains low and as such vessels are able to berth on quays of lower disturbance.

Overall, the analysis has shown that both scenarios (i.e. existing layout, proposed layout) are close in terms of score and hence they are considered equally effective against wave disturbance.